[...interesting, that's somewhat similar to a human expression. filing that away]
Emotions. I collect information on emotional states in different beings, primarily humans. If given further opportunities of this nature I will likely also focus on other sentient beings.
[Her first reflex is "that is dumb and whoever built you with that purpose is dumb."
But on second thought, a study of emotions from a one hundred percent unemotional viewpoint could prove very educational. Not that she could help it along, but she, and the world, could certainly benefit.]
I see. My apologies, I am unable to assist you in this research.
Firstly, strife is present among all forms of life, even among organisms too simplified to have the nervous system required to sustain emotion. While emotions are a transitory phenomenon, they are not a requirement for conflict; they are only what allow it to cause "suffering."
Second, large sections of humanity are already aware that certain types of emotion are conductive to conflict. Several existing religions and philosophies seek to control those emotions through various means with the goal of reducing such struggles.
Lastly, the majority of my research has provided evidence that emotion is beneficial, and a requirement for progress in all sentient beings I have so far had contact with. This is in direct opposition to your expectations.
My choice of wording was poor. You are correct, emotions enable suffering.
While religions have sought to reduce these struggles, they have, at large, been unsuccessful. It is not enough to take control of emotions, as they are, by nature, illogical and obstinate. The only logical course of action is to remove them entirely.
You cannot see this because it is not yet present in order to be observed. Humans are, as the stand, incomplete. They are unable to reach their true potential due to the suffering of the majority brought upon by "negative" emotions, along with "positive" emotions claiming they make their suffering and the suffering of many others acceptable and excusable.
...This is true. I cannot observe a human society without emotion. I am capable of observing myself; but while I am sentient, my thought processes do not match that of a human's.
However... You are human, and you claim to have given up your own emotions. If that is so, then please tell me this: what is your motivation?
[It actually takes her a moment to respond this time. This was one of the questions she's been asked considerably less, what with the only people privy to her true ultimatum able to be counted on one...finger.
She was surprisingly okay about the robot knowing. Though this tainted world caused it to be just a bit misguided, it was the closest thing to perfection she's come across in her lifetime.]
I possess emotions. They are, however, recognized for the hindrance they are and kept consciously suppressed.
[Yes, she's aware that didn't fully answer the question.]
[...deliberately obtuse, rather than just unintelligent, then. her admission just confirms that.]
Not perfectly, obviously. You would have no reason to withhold information if you did not "care" about my knowing on some level. In addition, I do not believe you would desire anything at all.
I am a being incapable of desire. If it weren't for a directive assigned to me after my creation, I would have no reason to attempt to fix faults, or do much of anything at all.
[thinking that over. would he, if he had no directive to see to the well-being of his sister? it's a little difficult to process past the immediate conflict; even if it's just a theoretical scenario, such an error could cause him to act erratically. even if he did not hurt her directly by doing so, discovery of it could cause emotional distress. that would be a violation of his purpose.
but if there was no directive to be violated...?]
... I would not, unless the drive to do so were specifically programmed into me.
...Perhaps I have overlooked a significant difference between mechanical and living beings. Living beings are born with "programming" to survive. Humans are capable of recognizing their need for improvement and to better their chances for survival. Even without "desire", that would not change. If an error is present, it must be removed. It is not a matter of emotional drive.
no subject
[...she did say they were intelligent. perhaps it would be more efficient if he asked them directly :|a]
no subject
no subject
[turning to the Pokemon] Would either of you be willing to answering my question?
no subject
"Such things"? Elaborate.
no subject
Emotions. I collect information on emotional states in different beings, primarily humans. If given further opportunities of this nature I will likely also focus on other sentient beings.
no subject
But on second thought, a study of emotions from a one hundred percent unemotional viewpoint could prove very educational. Not that she could help it along, but she, and the world, could certainly benefit.]
I see. My apologies, I am unable to assist you in this research.
no subject
whoever said he was built with that purpose?]Why not? You are human, correct?
no subject
However, the world as it stands does not realize the truth. Your research could prove beneficial to remedy this.
no subject
Your assumptions are incorrect.
no subject
no subject
Second, large sections of humanity are already aware that certain types of emotion are conductive to conflict. Several existing religions and philosophies seek to control those emotions through various means with the goal of reducing such struggles.
Lastly, the majority of my research has provided evidence that emotion is beneficial, and a requirement for progress in all sentient beings I have so far had contact with. This is in direct opposition to your expectations.
no subject
While religions have sought to reduce these struggles, they have, at large, been unsuccessful. It is not enough to take control of emotions, as they are, by nature, illogical and obstinate. The only logical course of action is to remove them entirely.
You cannot see this because it is not yet present in order to be observed. Humans are, as the stand, incomplete. They are unable to reach their true potential due to the suffering of the majority brought upon by "negative" emotions, along with "positive" emotions claiming they make their suffering and the suffering of many others acceptable and excusable.
no subject
...This is true. I cannot observe a human society without emotion. I am capable of observing myself; but while I am sentient, my thought processes do not match that of a human's.
However... You are human, and you claim to have given up your own emotions. If that is so, then please tell me this: what is your motivation?
no subject
Perfection.
no subject
no subject
She was surprisingly okay about the robot knowing. Though this tainted world caused it to be just a bit misguided, it was the closest thing to perfection she's come across in her lifetime.]
I possess emotions. They are, however, recognized for the hindrance they are and kept consciously suppressed.
[Yes, she's aware that didn't fully answer the question.]
no subject
Not perfectly, obviously. You would have no reason to withhold information if you did not "care" about my knowing on some level. In addition, I do not believe you would desire anything at all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
but if there was no directive to be violated...?]
... I would not, unless the drive to do so were specifically programmed into me.
no subject